New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed serious concerns over the practice of demolishing homes linked to accused or convicted individuals in criminal cases, commonly referred to as ‘bulldozer justice.’ During a hearing, the court questioned the legality of such actions, emphasising that demolitions should only occur if the property is illegal.
Justice BR Gavai, part of the bench, stated, “How can a house be demolished just because it belongs to an accused or even a convict?” The court hinted at establishing pan-India guidelines to streamline demolition procedures, ensuring actions align with municipal laws.
The bench, also comprising Justice KV Viswanathan, stressed the importance of due process, suggesting that before any demolition, proper notices should be served, and legal remedies should be provided.
Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, representing the petitioner, urged the court to curb the growing trend of ‘bulldozer justice.’ Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clarified that no property should be demolished solely because of criminal accusations against the owner, further stating that the issue was being misrepresented in the court.
The court will continue hearing the matter on September 17, seeking suggestions to address the issue comprehensively.
