New Delhi: Vrinda Grover, who is representing Ishrat Jahan’s family in court, on Thursday insisted that Ishrat had no terror links. She said that Headley’s statement is “extremely manipulative” and cannot be “treated as evidence” as per the Indian law. A judicial enquiry, the Gujarat High Court and the CBI all concluded that the encounter was fake.
Lawyer for Ishrat Jahan family Vrinda Grover argues that David Headley comments on Ishrat based on "double hearsay" & have "no legal value'
— barkha dutt (@BDUTT) February 11, 2016
She (Ishrat) was not a terrorist. 2 others who were shot dead may've been,even I think bcoz there is evidence pointing to that-Vrinda Grover
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
Why is the BJP so keen to prove that Ishrat is a terrorist? Did we not give Kasab a trial? : Vrinda Grover, lawyer pic.twitter.com/qlaZZkEfbJ
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
this man (Headley) has fabulous memory but he doesn't say Ishrat Jehan so the lawyer gives him options with her name. Absurd: Vrinda Grover
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
this man (Headley) has fabulous memory but he doesn't say Ishrat Jehan so the lawyer gives him options with her name. Absurd: Vrinda Grover
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
The lawyer put words in Headley's mouth, and now a political issue is being made out of the entire thing: Vrinda Grover
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
Govt lawyer like Amitabh Bachchan's show gives 3 options to Headley, is this evidence? this is political angle: Vrinda Grover, lawyer
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016
Lawyer then acts like he is hosting "Kaun Banega Crorepati" and gave Headley options. I mean, what is happening in the Court?: Vrinda Grover
— ANI (@ANI_news) February 11, 2016